Punishment theories of punishment utilitarian, society, theory. Utilitariandeterrence theory law and legal definition. The only thing that matters on a utilitarian theory is increasing utility. The belief was that for a criminal justice system to be effective, punishment must be certain, swift and in proportion to the. One of raskolnikovs motivations for committing the crime is the concept of utilitarianism. For menninger, punishment is nothing but the infliction of pain and suffering. Utilitarianism, punishment, and ideal proportionality in.
Punishment may take forms ranging from capital punishment, flogging, forced labour, and mutilation of the body to imprisonment and fines. Much debate surrounds how to punish criminal offenders. Punishment in the form of incarceration, then, benefits society as a whole because happiness is maximized when individuals are protected from becoming future victims of a known past offender. Whatever can be proved to be good, must be so by being shown to be a means to something. We pay the penalty because we owe it, and for no other reason. This theory emphasizes end over means, therefore it is a teleological or consequentialist ethical theory. Utilitarian theory retributive theory the utilitarian theory this theory stresses that punishment is entirely futurelooking for that one should be punished inorderto not because of hosper, 1967. My purpose in this essay is to make this strange comparison instructive. Utilitarianism, in normative ethics, a tradition stemming from the late 18th and 19thcentury english philosophers and economists jeremy bentham and john stuart mill according to which an action is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it tends to produce the reverse of happinessnot just the happiness of the performer of the action. The retributive or retributivist theory of justice considers punishment as an intrinsically appropriate. Utilitarianism provides the chief rival justification for criminal punishment, and.
Utilitarian view on persistent use of corporal punishment in secondary schools in kisii central sub county, kenya stephen okone and george makori egerton university abstract. Under the deterrent philosophy, punishment should prevent other people from committing criminal acts. This theory stems from jeremy bentham and john stuart mills who suggested that any action that provides or promotes happiness is right while actions that lead to unhappiness are considered wrong. Utilitarianism in crime and punishment by katie jander on. Reformative theory of punishment pdf download this paper open pdf in browser share email add to. Mong peacetime exercises of state power, the most vivid and principally problematic is arguably the practice of punishment. Rosen, utilitarianism and the punishment of the innocent.
Utilitarian deterrence theory is a legal principle that a person should be punished only if the punishment benefits society. Posted by andrew on may 5, 2012 in criminal law, key concepts 0 comments. He added that in this theory, punishment is applied in order to do. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished. If any further punishment is inflicted for utilitarian reasons, it will be simply, as mr. These families are known as criticallevel utilitarianism and criticallevel generalized utilitarianism.
The objectives of punishment were then related to attributions regarding the cause of a transgression. Punishment is justified because, it is claimed, it helps to control crime. A humanitarian theory is a variation of utilitarian theory that advocates therapy and treatment, not punishment. A more pure form of utilitarianism is required to achieve utilitarian goals with hard and fast. Lessons from, and for, criminal law paul butler introduction punishment is violent, but its violence has a purpose.
November 29 2009 a comparison of utilitarian theory and. Both theories assume that human actions are based on rational decisionsthat is, they are informed by the probable consequences of. Rational choice is based on economic theory derived from the same utilitarian tradition. Utilitarian punishment theory justified in the purpose it serves. Utilitarian theory assumes that happiness is the ultimate good, and other goods are whatever brings greater happiness.
Utilitarianism in crime and punishment by katie jander on prezi. Utilitarian theorists believe that punishment should be developed based on what is best for the public as a whole. In other words, the monetary loss of the sufferer is compensated and the criminal has to compensate for the loss. Jan 31, 2012 the utilitarian theory of punishment i. So let us now consider whether any of the three utilitarian flavored theories of. Reductivism is underpinned by the theory of moral reasoning known as utilitarianism,which maintains that an act. Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in. Retributive theories are examined in their own right in punishment. Kantian and utilitarian ethics on capital punishment. Recent scholarship on theories of criminal punishment has increasingly. We discussed the first on april 15 and the second on april 20. If convicted, the sentence a defendant receives is always, at least in part, a form of retribution. See green, thomas hill, lectures on the principles of political obligation, london, 1882 1941, pp. Utilitarian justifications are forwardlooking consequentialistic in nature.
Feb 28, 2017 modern theory of punishment modern theory of punishment is a combination of all the theories discussed above. On the utilitarian and retributive justifications of punishment. Bentham begins by laying out the principle of utility. The utilitarian theory of punishment university of north. Nov 29, 2009 a comparison of utilitarian theory and retributive justicepresented by austin cohenjus 303professor ratnabalasuriar slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. Greens theory of punishment, history of political thought forthcoming. Green does what he believes kant ought to have done. The aim of the philosophy of punishment is to understand the reason behind administration of punishment and the procedure used in determining the suitable punishment. Those who think of bentham as a rationalistic eccentric and of utilitarian ethics as coldly calculating should read the next two paragraphs in which bentham excoriates his fellow countrymen for tolerating such atrocious penalties. These counterintuitive results suggest there is something wrong with utilitarian premises. How, on the utilitarian theory, does scapegoating differ from punishing a guilty person to deter.
The other presented what he called the expressive theory of punishment. Garland confronts the greatest excesses of foucault in beyond the power perspective. Lyons, the forms and limits of utilitarianism, oxford, 1965, pp. So innocents are likely to be punished which is harsh.
As utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, the utilitarian must look to the consequences or outcome of possible punishment to determine when punishment should be applied. Modern theory of punishment modern theory of punishment is a combination of all the theories discussed above. Theories of punishment legal definition of theories of punishment. The commonly identified theories of punishment for lawbreakers are either utilitarian, in that punishment is justified because it leads to a better society by reducing crime, or they are retributive, in that punishment is justified because the convicted criminal is morally deserving of punishment. Retributivism was the clear beneficiary of such an approach. The utilitarian authors will offer answers to such questions as. These tensions in humes position have led some commentators to conclude that it is not easy to say where hume stood on this issue. Utilitarian demands punishment for every kind wrongful act either intended or unintended. The class of individuals that a utilitarian theory regards as objects of moral concern is typically dictated by its account of wellbeing. The retributivist and utilitarian theories for justification of criminal punishment. Utilitarian justifications for punishment our first theoretical foray into punishment is the utilitarian perspective. Punishment, the infliction of some kind of pain or loss upon a person for a misdeed i.
Raskolnikov adopts this theory in order to justify the murder of. Utilitarianism an ethical theory according to which the rightness and wrongness of acts depends entirely on facts about the maximization of overall wellbeing. If punishment is inflicted, there will be less crime committed thereafter than there would be. Although the view that punishment is to be justified on utilitarian grounds has obvious appeal, an examination of utilitarianism reveals that, consistently and accurately interpreted, it dictates unjust punishments which are unacceptable to the common moral consciousness. Utilitarianism states that the result of an act is the real measure of whether it is good or bad. Retributivism is a theory of justice that applies to the provision of rewards and. The utilitarian side of the punishment coin states that when someone is punished for committing a crime, the good of the punishment should be greater than the total bad of the crime, and that a punishment shouldnt be unlimited. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or deter. Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies.
Click here to read the utilitarian theory of punishment. The humanitarian theory of punishment my contention is that this doctrine, merciful though it appears, really means that each one of us, from the moment he breaks the law, is deprived of the rights of a human being. George hegel and immanuel kant criticized and rejected the utility theory, presented the contrast retributive theory of punishment, which is of non utilitarian on the premises that punishment is not means to an end but end in itself. Utilitarianism is based on the principle of utility. Pdf kantian and utilitarian ethics on capital punishment. In a note on utilitarian punishment 5 and again in a non utilitarian approach to punishment i argued from the logical possibility of such useful unjust punishments and unjust systems of punishment, i. The dichotomy of retributive justice vs utilitarian justice largely reflects the distinction between a consequentialist and nonconsequentialist approach to policy see duff and garland 1994. Theoretical attacks on utilitarianism the decline of utilitarian punishment and sentencing was also greatly accelerated by the fact that at the theoretical level there was a move towards. In his opinion, deprivation of human life by state authorities during the reign of peace should be prohibited because it does not produce any utility. The outlawing of corporal punishment cp in kenyas schools in the year 2001 was a significant step towards promoting education achievement in the country. I end by arguing that, given the insights of behavioral psychology, utilitarian goals of punishment are not sufficiently accomplished under limiting retributivism. The reason why utilitarianism is a popular theory is due to the fact that it puts. Karl menninger, whose views we considered in chapter two, gives such a theory. Utilitarianism is hard universalism that is that there is an absolute, universal principle of morality which is not subject to cultural interpretation.
Utilitarian theories avoid this entailment punishment is, in. On the utilitarian and retributive justifications of. The utilitarian justification for punishment appeals to what is best for society in general, and over the long run. The metaethic presupposed by my argument is an intuitionist one, but, as i have noted elsewhere. An introduction to jeremy benthams theory of punishment. The scope problem in punishment philosophy in action. Utilitarianism in crime and punishment essay 1874 words. Utilitarianism in crime and punishment the european. Proponents of the incapacitation theory of punish ment advocate that offenders should be prevented from committing further crimes either by their temporary or permanent removal from society or by some other method that restricts their physical ability to reoffend in. Kants theory of punishment utilitas cambridge core. Utilitarianism in crime and punishment by emmadellaposta.
This is the theory of punishment that much of the world adheres to, although the definition of severity varies depending on the culture and country. The humanitarian theory removes from punishment the concept of desert. Jeremey bentham the following is composed of selections from benthams an introduction to the principles of morals and legislation of the principle of utility. Utilitarian view on persistent use of corporal punishment in. Utilitarianism utilitarian theory hold that the rightness ofactions is determined solely by the amount ofconsequences they produce.
A major focus is on the deterrent effect of a criminal statute because if a criminal statute deters a criminal act then the public benefits because the crime does not occur. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to. The mistake comes from ignoring the painpleasure dimension of benthamite utilitarianism and from regarding the principle of utility itself as the sole criterion of. Specifically, a utilitarian theory tends to regard as objects of moral concern all individuals capable of having wellbeing. The most widely accepted rationale for punishment in the united states is retribution. The term crime does not, in modern criminal law, have any simple and universally accepted definition,1 though statutory definitions have been provided for. In addition, we will give voice to some major objections to the utilitarian theory. An attributional examination of retributive versus. It is evident that this cannot be proof in the ordinary and popular meaning of the term. Deferred punishments consist of penalties that are imposed only if an offense is repeated within a specified time. Accordingly, these examples are widely thought to illustrate the implausibility of the utilitarian theory of punishment. Utilitarian theorists observe that humans have two motivations in life, what bentham 2000, p.
Therefore punishing a criminal, is justified only if it results in a net increase of pleasure for. As utilitarianism aims at maximizing utility or happiness, it follows that punishment should be applied when it leads to an improved situation. For example, selling drugs on north america can translate into a conditional sentence, or even jail time, but in parts of the world it can warrant the death penalty. Utilitarianism and the capital punishment summary cesare beccaria initiated a new outlook on penal law, including the death penalty. The classical school of criminology advocated for better methods of punishment and the reform of criminal behaviour. So let us now consider whether any of the three utilitarianflavored theories of. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or deter, future wrongdoing. Utilitarian and retributivist theories of punishment essay. One gave an overview of the utilitarian and retributive justifications of punishment. Social norms, necessity, and social desirability are some of the factors that lawmakers balance when developing punishment statutes. For example, a gravely ill criminals incarceration no longer benefits society because he is unable to commit more crimes, so he may be released. A problem with the utilitarian theory of punishment.
For paternalist theories of punishment, the normative question instead becomes. The idea of utilitarianism, when applied to the criminal justice system can benefit those involved because what is best for society is an ethical question, one that must be answered. Maximization the view that the value of a state of affairs should be made as great as possible. A sentence may, however, combine utilitarian ideals with retribution.
Punishmentretribution, rehabilitation, and deterrence. This theory follows the notion that the greatest good for the greatest number of people should be the principle of conduct. The term crime does not, in modern criminal law, have any simple and universally accepted definition,1 though statutory definitions have been provided for certain purposes. Two basic goals of punishmentretribution and utilityand the means to those goals, including isolation, rehabilitation, and the creation of fear, were first examined. We should combine our forces o make sure no criminal gets away b. Utilitarian theory provides that one should act in a way that produces the best possible result. Utilitarian theory of punishment 99 indirect consequences stemming from it. The contributions of these philosophers regarding punishment still influence modern corrections today. We will write a custom essay on utilitarian and retributivist theories of punishment specifically for you. Utilitarianism is also a consequentialist theory in that only the consequences of an act count not the intentions which precipitated the act. The punishment should help to deter future harmful conduct.
The utilitarian justification for punishment sounds good on the surface, but boonin identifies several problems. In summary, the utilitarian believes that people should be punished when, and only when, it maximizes happiness to do so. Utilitarianism is the view that the rightness of an action depends entirely on expected utility, that is on the sum of the utilities of its consequences weighted by their various probabilities. Our obligation, or duty, in any situation is toperform the action that will result in the greatestpossible balance of good over evil. If the public does not believe that punishment is consistent for every offense of a certain crime then, even with notice, the potential punishment may not deter an. Utilitarian theorists observe that humans have two. Chief among these is that the utilitarian defense of punishment also implies that we may and, in some cases, should punish the innocent. It gives a forward looking justification and a backward looking justification. Utilitarian concerns play a major role in his theory. It was documented that punishment goals are mediated by the expectancies and affects that are elicited by causal beliefs. For example, a gravely ill criminals incarceration no longer benefits society because he is unable to commit. Explanation incapacitation is a reductivist or forward looking justification for punishment. Social cohesion, punishment intended to have effect upon honest people, punishing crime is a societal goal because crime is against society itself. Philosophical analysis of the theories of punishment in.
All of the questions about the justification of punishment general justification, title and severity will be answered by appeal to the utility value of the consequences of an action. This is because some of its arguments are subject to criticism. One theory of punishment is called the utilitarian philosophy, and generally assumes that whatever is best for society in general is the best course of action. Bentham adds that this punishment is reserved for negro slaves guilty of rebellion. In this article, i advance a new conceptual spin on the mixed theorist approach to criminal punishment one that can hopefully. Utilitarianism and the theory of justice by charles blackorby, walter bossert and david donaldson august 1999 prepared as chapter 20 of the handbook of social choice and welfare k. Nov 04, 2015 theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies. For one thing, the criterion dispute includes a dispute about whether. I also examine certain dualist theories, which attempt to combine elements of retributivism and.
Deterrence theory applies utilitarian philosophy to crime. It combines kant and mill resulting in kill, which is prima facie absurd d. Punishment is awarded to reduce crimes and used as means to an end, is the claim of the utilitarian. Questions of ultimate ends are not amenable to direct proof. If forty stripes save one is the proper punishment for any offence, the fortieth. Utilitarian and retributivist theories of punishment. Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. Retributist always treat the human being with dignity and honor by saying that the punishment is. Lacey, nicola punishment and the liberal world 1987. Utilitarian theories of punishment essay example topics. The mistake comes from ignoring the painpleasure dimension of benthamite utilitarianism and from regarding the principle of utility itself as the sole criterion of action in a topdown fashion.
575 776 1219 97 1222 1429 78 364 1011 1235 703 1441 372 941 378 685 856 493 1490 372 27 9 576 908 1285 357 461 1100 923 1275 737 1145 1295